Really not quite certain why "establishing 'ecological' footholds" is less testable than allowing for a wider diversity of other trophic characters, as Alfaro et al. argue.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Alfaro et al. 2009 : Fostering Other Sorts of Diversity
Alfaro et al. point out that the PJ innovations could have been a 'key innovation' that allowed them to successfully colonize new environments or develop more functional/trophic diversity. I find these statements to be intriguing merely for suggesting that different diversity currencies (stealing a term from DJ) could be increased by key innovation, independent from each other. What could this mean for the Simpsonian ecological explanation of key innovations? Why would a key innovation increase speciation rate in some cases and not in others? (Never mind how to explain cases where key innovation affect extinction rates (as in insects...)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment